dimanche 27 novembre 2011
Straight from the tap, she went u r having a conflicting end of a relationship, your ex-boyfriend wants an explanation, is there a better place than your parents home living room with them monitoring the situation behind the closed kitchen door, the answer is NO. U think he was worth it, u r probably wrong, never mind, and r ready to give him the privacy he asked for this conversation on a more neutral ground, choose a place u know, make sure a couple of ur good girlfriends are closed by, u don't have to tell him and they don't have to listen, just a few tables away in case.
U guys don't like that, do u? Let me tell u the good thing, a little frustration over ur pratt's angers is much better than years behind bars. Do u hear me.
Bet u hadn't had one like that. She was doing the drugs with the cops as well. I mean when u think I can remember that just like that... She was tough I tell u. Haven't yet, it just doesn't look very good. UBS AG being very pessimistic in a note, u have it on Business Week.
What r u up to?
vendredi 25 novembre 2011
jeudi 24 novembre 2011
What did u find on the legal side?
(Sorry, that was stupid just forgot, had assumed it was obvious only Confucius answers Lao Tseuq)
mercredi 23 novembre 2011
How does it look, think to enter a round of QE, they will stick to total control of pubic spending.
It isn’t so much about the blame game really. What I don’t get and frankly what I find rather ugly, shocking and more disturbing is how most officials look at it, sometime the Press as well, not asking enough for more. It isn’t the first time and won’t be the last, a dangerous criminal is released, everybody hates it but generally admits the inevitable character of this type of mistake with human decisions. Officials have promised to look at improvements that can be made regarding the dangerous character of a detainee, fine, if improvements can be made, they should but will ever be the perfect system with no failures, I doubt it.
But what to think of the chain of events that lead to the murder of that kid? As I see there will not be a public hearing of the inquiry into the decision made to release him, I start to feel uncomfortable. When I understand Officials are not going to investigate the cold blooded decision to trick and mislead the kids of that school that lead to the murder of one of them, I feel sick.
The truth being nobody can tell what her decision may have been had she known about the passed of the guy but the I insist the cold blooded decision to mislead her by hiding the key information about his criminal passed was an indirect encouragement to accept that walk on the wild side and at least has prevented her to ask herself what she should do.
Therefore, whoever made the decision to mislead her and tricked her encounter with her murderer took an indirect active role in the crime as a facilitator and what I want to know, will they stand trial. Are they going to sit next to the murderer as the crime is judged to find out what a jury has to say bout their degree of guilt in the process that lead to her death.
And I don’t want to know about the psychiatrist that made or not a mistake or whoever sign the release of the guy after a court decision always imperfect, I am talking of the individuals involved that made a cold blooded decision to hide facts, mislead and trick an entire group of youngsters that lead to the death or one of them in atrocious conditions.
Is an inquiry going to take place to find out who they are and will they be judged with the murderer to find out their degree of involvement in the crime for a jury to decide.
Am I wrong? no.
Down tonight by another step and something will have to be done soon, I guess. Now if a Germany’s auction don’t attract investors, how the hell eurobonds would get any…
mardi 22 novembre 2011
had a quick look but there isn’t much. I guess they won’t, not in their genes, they have a problem with the thing u may have felt when debate went public with politicians. Girls are preys, it is a culture thing, of course no violence should be involved but they r reluctant to go for a legislation giving them the means to be in charge as much as possible of their own security. U’ll be surprised but girls don’t get guidelines from school, u know the kind of stuff that used to make us laugh such as u go to a party, it’s getting late, people have been leaving, u feel like going as well but every time u make a move to say bye, some guy keep talking to you, u know his friends are still around and u don’t know them very well, leave, u r coming out of a party alone or with a girlfriend and guys in a pick up u saw at the party offer u a ride home, u know they have been drinking, whether u think u know them or u don’t doesn’t matter, don’t take a chance, call a cab, they don’t take it and leave it there, wait for the cab under a light make sure the area is busy, a good friend of yours has been drinking at the party and walks u home, he wants some coffee, be careful, are u sure u can handle it the situation once in gets out of control then followed the statistics about rapes committed by people u know, well the stuff we hated because then girls were giving us a real hard time…. But u know what, if I had had a girl I would have told her exactly that with the statistics.
“Among the 'core' economies, investors may be somewhat underestimating France’s vulnerability, while overestimating that of Austria,” said Higgins, who worries both countries' banking systems are vulnerable to problems in Southern and Eastern European markets respectively.
That’s Higgins. was on CNBC.
France - SHAME ON YOU - A 14 years old sacrificed for a bloody ideology
The bottom line of this story is she died because she was kept in the dark and as a consequence misplaced her trust and went for a walk to an isolated area with a rapist that raped and killed her.
SHAME ON YOU ALL!
14 years old she was owed protection, her school owed her safety, the judicial system owed her safety, the legislator as well as the executive br
branch owed her safety.
All of you failed and she died.
An unpredictable crime, SHAME ON YOU, never she would have followed the criminal if she had known who he was.
But is she the only one, no, there will be another one tomorrow or the day after, you have the European record of sexual misconduct going unpunished as potential victims are kept in the dark. Not one lady or any kids should be able to have a contact with any individual with a passed of sexual misconduct without knowing who they are dealing with.
The next victim of a rape will now definitely owe her tragic experience to a gov a president and legislators, all cowards not strong enough to decide that once for all that sexual misconduct of predators will be made public to make sure not one lady, young or else will be in touch with someone with a passed in that matter, endangering herself because left in the dark.
YOUR CHOICE TO KEEP THE NEXT VICTIM IN THE DARK IS A CRIME.
SHAME ON YOU
lundi 21 novembre 2011
France amazing hypocrisy… as the debate rages after the horrible death of a young teenager exposed recklessly to a known dangerous sexual predator over who ultimately may be responsible, the feeling ideologues are about to win again drawing down the arguments towards a possible mistake or how to do a better job to evaluate how someone may be dangerous can be heard throughout all the medias. Do they they lie and manipulate, probably, they know or should know it is about priority and for 95% od that kind of crime whether first timers or has done it again, it is all about circumstances and circumstances are absolutely unpredictable by nature, so any attempt to predict someone may or may not find himself or else again in to circumstances that will trigger a criminal act is absolutely outrageous.
Right now rehab ideologues have it their way, they have a powerful lobby and the politicians are listening to these guys, they set the top priority and the top priority is maximum comfort for their experiences and nobody gets to know who is the criminal and where he is, it would according to them somewhat jeopardize the chance of success of their rehab experiences careless of the consequences for the public, yes absolutely, careless of the consequences.
Now if you disagree with them, you will be inevitably be suspected of fascism eventually worse and at least an enemy of progress. BUT, have you ever ask yourself why the theory that establishes it is better that you and your kids don’t know where and who the sexual predators are because it may be dangerous for them as you the ordinary citizen could act unlawfully on him, accept the odd that people with no criminal records may be become criminals under these circumstances but the know criminal may not act unlawfully again whatever the circumstances may be?
Don’t let yourself be abused once more and make sure there will be not another Agnes by making sure the top priority is changed. The top priority should have been and should be the safety of your kids and for that to happen all the girls in the school and the neighborhood needed to know who he was and told that under no circumstances they should ever be alone with him out of reach of an adult supervising. If the top priority had been the girls safety, she would be alive. Don’t make mistakes the rehab ideologues lobby is already at work making sure nothing will change and are right now advising the french gov to put it sleep until it goes from the headlines and then it will be business as usual.
They want it their way, they are doing rehab experiences and if the price to pay is a few lives, they don’t care, they consider a few mishaps' are inevitable, the ideology’s victory can suffer some innocent losses.
Rebuff the argument, the top priority must change, it had to be the kids safety and well very true the guy’s life would have been much more uncomfortable if the girls had known, he would have had a much harder time and all the efforts to make to get himself accepted, the ideologues would have had a very bad time and a lot to work on getting him accepted in the school and with all the other parents but at the end of the day that doesn’t mean kids would have been impolite to him in classroom and in school in general but extremely cautious to not expose themselves and she would be alive.
dimanche 20 novembre 2011
That little girl was deliberately exposed to a criminal and she died under atrocious circumstances to satisfy a criminal ideology of careless and irresponsible rehab system neglecting the victims. The choice of policies the french regime is engaged in proves to be ideologue's experiences making true victims ederlies as well as kids and deserved to attract international attention and a special surveillance.
vendredi 18 novembre 2011
Disgusting!
lundi 14 novembre 2011
May become more aggressive as the investigation about why those who had access to at least Moody's but it seems now that more agencies made available the same kind of data in 2007 probably before didn't act including the national regulators of France...
dimanche 13 novembre 2011
M into the the proposed overhaul of the rules applied to rating agencies that leaked from the Commission…. But as I m into Mr we don’t need an authorization insane stuff, will post to u later probably tomorrow why it won’t help and it is counterproductive, someone mentioned during the chat that early Moody’s made available allsorts of new information about the subprime mortgages packed into the mortgage backed securities. The data mentioned the number of loans delinquent for a given pool of loans underlying a bond.
Any tip on that, date of release of the data? Cause it would be a game changer when it comes to who hasn’t done his job….
For the proposed stuff coming out from the commissioner this could explain part of it..?
samedi 12 novembre 2011
Disgusting!
lundi 7 novembre 2011
dimanche 6 novembre 2011
vendredi 4 novembre 2011
Shame, Shame, Shame
It started yesterday, the French press as well as a lot of politicians have assumed publicly that the Greeks cannot make an educated choice should a referendum to be organized extending the view that at time of a crisis, citizens understand dummies will do something stupid, of course the very same folks are the first ones to judge and decide what’s democratic and what’s not. Assuming nations can’t make educated choices have of course nothing to do with the fact that the press does a very poor job with a bunch of politicians exploiting that poor job to make sure the citizens will show sometime impatience they will promptly use to declare they can’t be asked to make educated picks, these poor things don’t get all the implications, we know better…. Want an example, since the EFSF and the SPV got out of the box, how many interviews of politicians have taken place and how many have been asked how the EFSF debt service will be funded and what’s the plan to get rid of that debt should it be a multi-decade thing?
I’d say not once.
This morning, not just have I heard by the usual liberal pundits so fast to chase the heretic that it is impossible to organize referendums at time of crisis because of the above but on top of it causes markets to go down, no kidding…. So not just, sometimes the Press doesn’t play its role on the citizen’s side to help the educated choice to be possible but it does the contrary helping some politicians with the same old tune markets and democracy don’t fit, look, the Greeks want to organize a referendum and markets go down….
So, do markets go down because the Greeks want a referendum, of course not, markets go down because first, some investors have been surprised and decided they needed time to allow themselves to study the fallout of a Greek No should it be their decision over their strategy of investments and while doing so to be cash surely the best way to escape shortfalls, second, big and hot money such as myself were following Brussels meeting expecting billions and billions of public money to be poured in the system with a first consequence inflate assets why not make a quick buck with some money on the market before the public money kicks in. A Greek referendum, yes or no is just a game changer that has the potential to delay the public money kick therefore investors pack until they get a better idea on when the money may be poured in or if it will and while waiting head to the sidelines but investors or markets have absolutely no opinions on should the Greek have or have not a referendum only politicians do.
Why they do, it a catch 22 they love to have, at least they say so, citizens making educated choices but frankly what’s their life expectancy if citizens were given all the information that lead to this debt crisis? Starting with how was a referendum necessary to approve the gross general gov debt ratio level but none was necessary to blow it and keep doing so for nearly 8 years?
jeudi 3 novembre 2011
mercredi 2 novembre 2011
Janet said that. She says does it question Great Britain, I add Sweden along with a few others EU membership status. I’d say yes it does, the target isn’t ultimately just Greece for that matter, Greece is just a proxy they use. President Sarkosy of France recently is an interview he gave to the french press pointed out that in his opinion the Eurozone wasn’t integrated enough while the EU was too much integrated. I’d say this opinion is now on display through the hysterical threat and vindictive threat the European Commission has has made to Greece that it would be impossible to quit the euro without leaving the European Union altogether. Janet adds What’s the legal force of this statement?
Is the Greek crisis used to push an agenda much larger than just Greece and to be, hint towards a hard push to Eurozone or nothing? Looks like it. The EFSF debt service to require so much funding that it is expected to watch some arm twisting on northern Europe nations get in while u can, we r soon to shut down the EU shop.
EU threats to Greece become more hysterical
Backlash? Possible too, as soon as the accounting of the trillions debt the EFSF will end up borrowing to heal the eurozone debt crisis as a whole and people start to ask how will be funded the service of that giant debt as well as a plan to get rid of it, some nations could conclude they have a limited time to rush to the exit before they see themselves ruined….?
Not yet and don’t think so. Keep in mind that it is a French Gov. that blew the international treaty when it comes to the Gross general Gov. debt GDP ratio as early as the budget 2003 and that has today tremendous consequences on the EU leadership if any….
And they r absolutely scared of the Greek initiative cause they r about to engage themselves into a new record amount of debt in an ultimate effort to hold up the Dutch, Finns and a few others savings through indebtness, a direct threat to the tactic would be to see other nations asking for a referendum on more debt and inevitably a record amount of taxes to hit northern Europe in the years to come when it will be clear than nobody else can pay to service the giant EFSF debt…..
Right now, it is the problem. They r petrified because of instead of being one more ordinary politician they have to deal with a leader gutsy enough to face his nation and tell them, folks, here we r make ur pick, it is ur future and whatever u choose, u’ll have to choose it for urself and be dedicated, fully committed and involved with ur choice.
Tough for euzone pussIPBIPBIP.
Alright know what u r about to say, don’t, I just couldn’t resist the hell of it…. Enjoy.
mardi 1 novembre 2011
Don’t think so. All that bunch is just scared because the guy feels strong enough to engage with the Greek nation while they are too weak to do the same. By the way add to the search Switzerland had had a great democratic life for decades using referendums and while some other countries manage to associate every community and all interests to the decisions making process and compromise, not a common practice within the eurozone, there can’t be any problem to see Greece’s democratic traditions take the lead to organize a referendum.