Meaning what? Look this is among the discrepancies. What are your motives when you decide to give the images that change the propaganda of your enemy you have denounced calling you the fascist junta hating anything Russian into information supporting a war time media communication?
Generally speaking you pursue the goal to prove your enemy's communication to its people is made of lies, why would you decide to engage into any military actions that are not decisive on the ground not to say useless when you know it will produce images supporting the worse accusations of your enemy's communication you are fighting while your only message underlying the operations you are getting out is discontent and lack of understanding for one of the calendar highlight of the community you are engaged in a confrontation with some of their representant?

Meaning anybody of Russian culture, descent or of Slavic brotherhood culture, a mix of we are glad the Soviet Union belongs to the passed but that history made who we are today and May the 9th is among the most important things that unite us regardless of our backgrounds celebrated throughout the USSR former republics. The message Kiev's sent that day doesn't suffer any interpretation and definitely prevented Russia to play any moderator role. Was it among the goals of the operations of that day? Possible, a little more than that considering the tv images of tanks shooting at civil parades effect on the Russian tv networks audience enough to silence for a long time any critic of the Federalists and growing the crowd of unconditional support.

Just more of the same. The Kiev crowd keeps its military operations on going around the crash site and complains the Federalists are hampering the investigation fighting back... which u will admit is not serious if truly the investigation is a priority meaning Kiev' stance to say the least is ambiguous. Note that for the first time an EU member found the courage to ask Kiev to quit its operations preventing the investigators to reach the site.
Although whether the western diplomacy doesn't say everything whether they missed the message the Kiev crowd delivered on May the 9th which to make it short was there is no future in the New Ukraine for anybody May the 9th is meaningful.

No

I haven't but if u r right, distance himself from the Donbass Federalists if written like that doesn't make any sense based on what

Where did u read that? As to travel mine was open so had no problem and I should be on time to sail it down there.

According to that the launcher came from Russia but after years of efforts from Russia to make a comeback, they compromise everything by allowing a sophisticated and extremely dangerous piece of weaponry in the wrong hands to go to a neighbouring country, unchecked, to support a political movement engaged in an armed confrontation with their central Gov...
The very same team was years ago a source of relief when the fear was the dissemination of the arsenal of nuclear weapons or parts of those weapons following the collapse of the Soviet Union with the potential to fall in the wrong hands in troubled republics....
They could be trusted to secure such a dangerous arsenal spread over a number of countries including dangerous grounds but not over a ground  to air missile launcher, they say they didn't allow...

Yes I read you.... the Russians train, breed and cuddle the Donbass Federalists, they share the responsability with the Federalists. The problem with that theory is u still don't know what happened on-board for now... and it doesn't look good for you. Too many discrepancies.

I know, saw it but it lacks credibility. The OSCE has recently released the number of 250 civilians killed by Ukrainian forces including women and kids for the city of Luhansk alone with absolutely no concerns expressed from anybody. Of course they speak Russian which may explain why the killings look somewhat admissible but .... it is not.

Why...May be just the right time for Scientists to fly military Welcome to the 21st century

If indeed there were 100 scientists on-board fighting a so called "God's sword beheading sinners" it made that flight a target of choice for a recently very active group such as Isis, the fact the flight went down can well be just a coincidence as long as what ever went on-board is ignored, the pilot themselves could well be operatives themselves and shoot two birds with the same stone kill the scientists and cause an international crisis by crashing the plane in that area or operatives that boarded the flight did it. With the Brussels Jewish Museum in mind, they have the resources on the ground to do it.

The Donbass Federalists may prove to be ultimately responsible but the accusations have been made too fast and are felt as well too convenient in light of all the efforts recently made to rent rebrand Islamic operatives terror operations.

Twice cause u don't know if it is u jumped on the missile wagon but ... it may be another pilot gone wild or the new type of device that lead to the most recent set of new guidelines regarding small electronics that can't be taken on-board if the device has a dead battery. Given that only flights to usually targeted destinations have applied the guidelines, Islamic operatives may have picked an easy target.

Keep digging u r dead... If Federalists had any S300 or Beech batteries by now Ukraine would be without any air force left... so Ukraine jet did it

Alright and? The Ukrainian military planes or helicopters that were taken down were operating surveillance or shelling missions and have been shot at close range...

Tell u u gonna loose

What for? If it was shot down and crashed it was shot long before where it crashed... dummy! Calculate that after the impact of the object flying at an average speed of 800 g at 10 thousands meter high don't brake in the air to fall like a stone where it was shot so it leaves you with a Ukrainian jet misfire.... but given the actual positions of federalists they can't have fired the missile that got the plane down if it is a missile.