I'm about to leave it for now. Send me the graphs for next week in the morning on sunday.

Well, I guess that if Christians didn't all become Muslims at the time, they had some good reasons to choose to do so meaning they deeply disagreed with the content I suppose. I told you you have to refer to what lead to the First Amend and try to find out what had in mind the Founders when writing it and choosing to have it as the first words of the Bill of Rights. What did they want to solve then, what were the conflicting situations they had met and what were their thoughts about the nature and the risks of future conflicts such an Amend would be able to solve? And frankly, as controversial it may sound, to me, the situation in which the Pastor Jones is is exactly what the Founders were trying to solve with the First Amend. Ask yourself who is the weakiest party at the dispute, who is threatening to solve it through the use of force or intimidation and who is facing a possible Federal Gov intervention even if it is a friendly type of intervention? The answer to that clearly indicates to me who and why the First Amend is protecting. That said, should the Pastor go ahead is something he and his community have to decide for themselves but don't make mistakes I can predict that if nothing is done to care for the 09/11 victims families pain over what was a very inappropriate and sick project, we'll see more of that.

I'm looking for the course I had so many years ago if I find it, will send it.