Not so much. But it is rather strange than civilisation has just so much trouble reaching these guys specially high ranking french officials... U know how it is don't u?
I mean in a country where u have multiple faiths u know that religious issues are to be highly contentious and controversial. Therefore when u don't have the luck of a constitutional equivalent of the 1st Amend, u have to make sure that the legislation in place sets a strong principle and transparency at every step of the process in order to avoid any unecessary controversies. U will laugh but today a journalist asked a senior french politician if she minds eating religious sposored meat if she doesn't know about it......?
Whatever her response was, it sets a rather unacceptable standard under which what u don't know doesn't hurt.... no kidding.
It would be unacceptable to see any faith followers tricked and sold products that are not what the label says it is under the principle what u don't know doesn't hurt and it is just as unacceptable to see anybody tricked and sold any product hiding its origin or the process it went through.
From the respect of every consumer in the legislation who ever he may be and whatever his choices may be through  a transparent process is probably the best way to reduce tensions and avoid most of the controversies.
What do u say?
Unthinkable to see that in Florida?