The idea that there can be a western inspiration behind a double standard for native nations depending on where they are and under which administration they find themselves is wrong. I can't find the legitimacy of standing behind a decision made by a former USSR leader which at the time contradicted every single standard of how natives should be treated. Even if today there are some eventually more obvious  motives behind Russia's decisions, they can't be binding to the extent of contradicting the most basic values of human dignity the free nations stand for. The disposal of native Crimeans and their land by the USSR out of any consultation of their will was wrong and still is, it is a travesty to pretend to see it binding for any party and not worth an armed conflict. That said thanks for the images.