Easy really for me, the so called "gift" of Crimea to Ukraine was and remains a communist monstrosity among the many committed against the Russian People, the fact that the victims were, are mainly ethnic Russians doesn't, shouldn't make it right. So it lead me to reach the conclusion that undoing that crime against the Russian nation was the right thing to do regardless of the fact that today's Russian politicians have a cute reserve to name things, that mix of feelings connected to a painful passed also associated with a degree of pride felt during the considered period, it says interesting things of the Russian nation, history doesn't deny. That was my fist for. The ethnic linguistic divide driving most of the recent events leaves Crimea in a vulnerable situation, the low local Kiev involvement legal status fragile enough to be reversed, an option the New Kiev powers could easily pick given the perceived sentiment of a blind support from the "western powers". The lack of a clear pledge to protect the Crimea Russian character given the renewed prominent Ukrainian character of Ukraine meant the wise choice peace wise was to undo and reverse the unjustifiable decision made in 1953. That was my second for.
What's holding your 's do u know if those in Finland have cast theirs