He's looking into it but generally speaking any decision can't have the consequence to deprive any individual of any of the international legal provisions protecting the Native Nation. Watch out for a post later in the day.

Sorry I m not fluent in Corsu but he refers to the battle of Pontu Novu and I m hardly any better at Corsica's history but "Voltaire, in his Précis du Siècle de Louis XV, admiringly wrote about the battle: "The principal weapon of the Corsicans was their courage. This courage was so great that in one of these battles, near a river named Golo, they made a rampart of their dead in order to have the time to reload behind them before making a necessary retreat; their wounded were mixed among the dead to strengthen the rampart. Bravery is found everywhere, but such actions aren't seen except among free people."
You can find a little more here http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Ponte_Novu
More here

Ideologies in Action: Language Politics on Corsica

 By Alexandra Mystra Jaf
Http://books.google.fr/books?id=4GhQ3GF5BQUC&pg=PA44&lpg=PA44&dq=battle+of+ponte+novu&source=bl&ots=J65m5Bv2VV&sig=BO_CAWovTjj7gJBO_z5TEhvHKvA&hl=en&sa=X&ei=7jNMVJTdCMXaaqCggPAM&ved=0CCkQ6AEwAw
Limited browsing and unchecked with any Corsican Nation representative as to how they feel about it.

Here it is but no key board right now so can't type it download it from State Report  (including Annexes) what u r looking for is page 10 & 11, although the legal provisions are specific so ?

It is the nail is in no kidding just to make sure U read.... Hold it as for now everybody hope the delayed information about the slain suspect connection with radical Islam has not caused delays for communities to take all the necessary steps to make sure they stay safe following the expected ripples after Canada's.

https://mobile.twitter.com/ArmedResearch/status/525019752507658240/photo/1
Allegedly ISIS media account post (Michael Abdul Zehaf Bibeau, born in Canada in 1982,  
Press reports Bibeau was described variously by eye-witnesses as a young-looking Caucasian with black hair, wearing a dark clothing and as an “Arabian” looking man with “long hair and a small beard” who was wearing a scarf over his face and who “kind of raised his arms in triumph holding the rifle” after gunning down Cirillo.
(See more at: http://thespeaker.co/ottawa-shooter-identified/#sthash.59DPY5S4.dpuf)

I don't think so... according to me... it is too sophisticated for most of these politicians. The guy is clever and it is no coincidence that at a time of extreme economic hardship with a resurfacing debate about who is and isn't a true French, never mind how absurd this is... he picked the most controversial political individual in the French recent history who overtime justified or not became the most evil symbol of the defense of French "purity" through his alleged action as head of the interim gov during France occupation by the nazis, to expose that even this man through the definition he had of the French people and based his negotiation with the Nazis, had admitted and made his that naturalization was a mean to acquire the quality to belong to the French people.
Do u get me, think it was the point he wanted to make. A total fiasco it looks but the needle is in the coffin and we'll see.

http://video.foxnews.com/v/3852908103001/growing-concern-in-canada-over-radical-islam/#sp=show-clips

I knew I'd say something like that :-)) can do that myself but it doesn't help to connect the dots.... Not much yet
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/10/22/authorities-met-with-radicalized-quebec-man-in-weeks-before-deadly-attack-on/
And, the same thing happened when speaking of the deal, yes it did, he was speaking of the deal, actually among the consequences and instead of having a yes or no as were these consequences fact checked, the conversation turned to his opinion of the deal without him truly asking why was the conversation taking that turn as he kept speaking of the deal itself which soon makes it an insane conversation. So I m telling you again how from an argument about the deal u assume it isn't about it but about his opinion in the same way when he questions an allegation it ends up assumed as his opinion?

No I m missing a hidden step and can't figure it out why I m wondering if u do

Not really what I am interested in and want to understand is why and how from questioning the below they reach the conclusion he supports and justify the ugly deal in the toughest version on the soft side the deal meant good at least for some... it is the gap I don't get

Unclear for now, the known facts are there was a ban on the Corsican Nation flag not motivated and as a consequence with the FCNM not signed all sorts of disturbing behaviours and disrespect for the native nations under French administration, flags, languages and culture are to be seen and lead to violence.
Why?

That I don't know. But the amazing thing is the guy was selling his new book called the French decline and is often involved in debating difficult and controversial matters and hadn't dreamed I guessed of a better illustration of his speech about the decline. As soon as it had emerged he had questioned the below, he was immediately portrayed alternatively as a militia member doing some Nazi salute in the back room of a biker's bar after his 25th beer or someone using the Vichy controversy to better sell his book with poor language, poor thinking and as usual with difficult matters in the most messy and disorderly conducted tv debate you can imagine ending with bird names and promises of political and mainstream media excommunication which couldn't show better the inability to handle difficult matters and controversies orderly illustrating both a decline of the use of an elaborated language and sophisticated thinking. Wondering if he did unpurpeous.

You shouldn't be so harsh, if you had carefully listened to what he said, he is questioning the Vichy's head of government alleged antisemitism through the definition he had of the French people?? when he negotiated with the nazis the deal that lead to consider Judaism not defining when confronted with the French citizenship.
Rather funny to be honest to offer the "rehabilitation", something he's accused of, of someone under the condition he wasn't what he allegedly was.
You look good.

It has and not that long ago but  m not sure of what u ask, if it is the promise of somekind of fake right to access rewards for everyone, the answer is always the same no.

The Corps whose spirit of personal responsibility, sense of duty and integrity are among and this spirit can be contagious and easily extended when there is a will to do so.

Same story always. Why

Never said that but while education systems are in pain and suffer setbacks not just in Europe but more widely in the developed world, the country able to remedy the situation in a timely manner remains the US when there will be a will to do so. That is what I said.

No they did.

U wanna bet

Well I am not surprised but who started it and wanted a take now... u did

Yes he should be asked to before anything else minding he can still take sides support Kiev and the Western Ukraine but through higher education and a range of projects serving the needs of these populations. I would agree with that, given the circumstances before throwing dirt and the launch of an ugly campaign including the sack of a range of organisations to destroy his reputation, I will support he is asked to redirect the funding of any militia and weapons to peaceful projects and emphasize his today responsibilities within these organisations force him to do so.

I know you'd say that but if once double checked the truth about what lead to that campaign, I think the right thing to do is to ask him to redirect the spending to education. Obviously he has decided to support one side in the conflict and because the conflict is along ethnic lines as well as culture and history tied to terrible conflicts,  he has as a successful individual and member of a community not involved in the conflict a very special responsibility and given his talent demonstrated in business, all the capabilities to be an asset to promote peace and projects that pursue national reconciliation.

M thinking about it but at first sight I will oppose the campaign and the petition aimed at sacking Kolomoiskyi and destroying his reputation.