I knew I'd say something like that :-)) can do that myself but it doesn't help to connect the dots.... Not much yet
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/10/22/authorities-met-with-radicalized-quebec-man-in-weeks-before-deadly-attack-on/
And, the same thing happened when speaking of the deal, yes it did, he was speaking of the deal, actually among the consequences and instead of having a yes or no as were these consequences fact checked, the conversation turned to his opinion of the deal without him truly asking why was the conversation taking that turn as he kept speaking of the deal itself which soon makes it an insane conversation. So I m telling you again how from an argument about the deal u assume it isn't about it but about his opinion in the same way when he questions an allegation it ends up assumed as his opinion?