n'empêche pas visiblement les mots qui blessent qu'aucune loi n'élimineront jamais. Que ceux qui s'accommodent assez bien de l'absence de droits d'accès aux médias de tous les mouvement d'idées et d'opinions (à l'exception des mouvements issue d'idéologies de haine et de mort) en particulier visant les nations ayant des terres ne devraient pas être surpris. L'absence d'un 1er Amend n'autorise pas la naissance d'une doctrine visant son contenu... d'un débat public sur ce qui blesse qui et pourquoi....
Read, read, Read
The New York Times - Jeffrey Rosen
In the 21st century, the heroic First Amendment tradition may seem like a noble vision from a distant era, in which heroes and villains were easier to identify. But that doesn't diminish the inspiring achievements of First Amendment heroism. Conservative as well as liberal judges now agree that even speech we hate must be protected, and that is one of the glories of the American constitutional tradition. Anthony Lewis is right to celebrate it.
In the 21st century, the heroic First Amendment tradition may seem like a noble vision from a distant era, in which heroes and villains were easier to identify. But that doesn't diminish the inspiring achievements of First Amendment heroism. Conservative as well as liberal judges now agree that even speech we hate must be protected, and that is one of the glories of the American constitutional tradition. Anthony Lewis is right to celebrate it.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire