Why do the french autorities hate so much some tiny, poor, defenseless communities to free criminals imposing their violence on folks ethnic selected that don't have the 2nd, Castle and other legislation to protect their families and belongings remain to me a mystery.

It looks political and it is but is it a state crime? What evidence should the folks be collecting to sue? I mean if a state deliberately exposes some citizens to violence for political purposes with prior to that adopt legislations to make sure the folks have to choose in between trying to survive the violence or kill the perpetrators if they can manage to get some weapons and go to prison, how they build their case? They have collected the facts but what about the evidences they need regarding the political will to expose selected ethnic communities to violence and crimes for political motives and the state will to make sure the legislations in place prevent these communities to be in charge of their own security as they can't access any weaponery or act upon threats they may face while in the mean time, the state autorities make sure the security forces in uniforms are too few or too far to do anything?

I mean you get it? It's pretty vicious.

I mean, previous problems of that kind of state crime was easier to establish. How and what kind of evidences you need when the violence and crimes aren't commited by the state and its official or so forces but they use some other ethnies to exercise the violence and crimes to serve a political agenda on selected ethnically based communities? See what I mean.

look I gotta go now but will get back to you. Getting it? Usually less sophisticated?