U didn't come and chose to next time be there. It is a two hours train trip... that's all. What she had to say was interesting and I'd say fits in. On top of that, it is a much better proposal than jump on mosque's roof, it doesn't lead to appear on tv but it doesn't drive to courts and ultimately will do much more good. Anyway, in short, bottom line was, we can't change history, we can make a lot of wishes for a better world but end game, life goes on. We can't prevent national gov to engage in linguistic abusive policies, economic policies such as making "national champions", use immigration policies for political football regardless of the consequences for both immigrants and native nations, attempt to outnumber some native groups. We can't change the demographic dynamics or the lack of will following a very long period of abuse.
The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities and the other legal instruments of the Council of Europe devoted to the protection of national minorities have proven to be ineffective, inter alia because they have not been ratified by all the member States and their implementation depends on political consensus within the Committee of Ministers.
But there is one thing we can do to prevent abuse and give any individual or groups belonging to national minorities the legal weapon she, he, they need to uphold those rights directly before the European Court of Human Rights, by lodging individual or collective applications, under Article 34 of the Convention. There is hope as well that an additional protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights on national minorities can be enough to end the abusive policies in place.
Although, support for this additional protocol is essential to its success.

Round up is here ----->
That's all I can think of right now.