Obvious.... No and No. That is not going to happen and frankly whether you are the elected official involved or the couple... it may be better to get some advice and help elsewhere. And that's why it lead me to say that under the state arch, couples engaged, out of what the two individuals involved will make out of it, exclusively in a legal relation and most of them are doing so with very little knowledge and no advice at all.
For the state, to sponsor couples entering a  legally very binding contract with very little knowledge of the legal consequences that will result of that contract while offering nothing else than the satisfaction to have the name of a religious institution "marriage" outside any religion for a union hardly anything more than a legal contract since you will find difficult to overcome any crisis or be inspired for a durable couple experience in the state prose, is wrong? I concluded it is.