Soon to be in love with Morgan, looks inevitable. Thanks to Adam. Just kidding but be honest, what are her chances to keep her business flourishing if she does otherwise, would you stay around a fire range with next to you a guy with an Allahu Akbar phone ring bell or anyone deem to belong to the kind of organisation that has at some point in history seen some of its members engaged in violence and killings. I wouldn't feel comfortable. Thinking of what leads me to wonder how to deal with the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 which is the law of the Land and no one not even Morgan thinks it shouldn't apply, her reference to we are not making wedding cakes here but shooting with lethal weapons pointing to her decision would be different had she been running a bakery she wouldn't be banning anyone clearly appear through that statement. Therefore it looks only fair to admit that her decision to run her gun range business not accepting people she thinks may have been in contact with a criminal ideology and in this specific case "radical Islam" has more ties with her obligations to take every measure possible to insure her customers security than it has to do with the violation of the civil rights act of 1964 and the suspected prejudice her opponents pretend she has towards Muslims, her decision to belong to her discretionary power to ban anyone she thinks unfit to practice the use of fire arms in the premises she owns. 
Is it fair? It isn't but is it a violation of the civil rights act motivated by an underlying ideology of hatred towards Muslims as her opponents pretend or is it the result of circumstances that runs from the majority of her existing customers reaction and the financial liability tied to their loss, her obligation to take every step possible to insure her customers security exposing her liability and her right to run a successful business. I go for number two. I don't think she will play the private club game which is odious and perjury rarely helps, it is a private club or it isn't not to mention that often it is a game that has been used to shelter less admissible motives.
Finally, she was very straight forward in answering the questions with sometime candour honouring her however a legal advice on how to both fulfill her legal obligations better and improve her evaluation techniques of unsuitable individuals for the practice of firearms to replace the patronyms examination is suitable I think and I hope she will get it. 
The Federal authorities have no tax money to waste for some entities to score political points when a situation where clearly no ideology or militants groups are involved can be solved with a little help eventually by people of goodwill. Will ask Kim.