Today's fun - Scandalous Sarky's aid still in the midst of a rebouding fight

Going toe to toe with the SRPJ police team:

What have you guys asked the suspect that could not be verified immediately and could explain why he was kept in custody for 48 hours...you hadn't done to identify the emails sender in the first place?

The consequences may be terrible for the taxpayer... if the defense of the suspect can show he was kept in custody not to satisfy the inquiry need as he had been identified without doubt as the email sender before his arrest but just kept in to scare , harrass and bully him... he will be soon asking for millions and I won't blame him...

Following the reactions in the Press Mrs Dati has wished to let the public know why she decided to contact the police and engaged outraging costs at the taxpayer's expense to suit her desire to see the suspect punished for daring to send emails to her mentionning her mistake.... In the statement she mentions she felt threatened for her safety..?

Mrs Dati's statement

Chers tous,
Je tenais à faire une mise au point, suite aux différents articles de presse concernant le dépôt de plainte. Vous avez été quelques uns à me faire part de votre incompréhension. Je tenais donc à préciser les conditions dans lesquelles s'est fait ce dépôt de plainte.
Mon entourage mais aussi des journalistes m'ont parlé à plusieurs reprises de mon intervention sur Canal +, et vous l'aurez peut-être remarqué, je l'ai toujours pris sur le ton de l'humour. La différence avec, non pas le courriel, mais les courriels que j'ai reçus de cette personne, c'est qu'au vu de leur nombre et de l'insistance des propos qu'ils contenaient, je ne pouvais plus considérer sa démarche comme une simple plaisanterie.
Je me suis sentie menacée. Au delà d'être une élue, je suis une femme et une mère, et j'ai tout simplement eu peur pour ma sécurité et surtout celle de ma fille. Bien à vous, Rachida Dati

To be honest, the statement makes things worse. (stay tuned)

Mrs Dati is a well known politician, a former Secretary, a powerful person with powerful high profile friends, the type of police intervention proves it.... Who's going to buy she felt threatened when she didn't even bother, number one, answer the first email to tell the sender his conduct was inappropriate and warn him of the legal consequences of his actions should he decide to send more mails, number two, she doesn't feel the need for an antispam, number three she didn't bother blocking the sender's address making him confortable to go on with more, number four will she dare telling the public she didn't know how to block a sender...?

Now what? Was it something to do? I guess not but let's be honest when you're powerful you can expect some of that even more of that when you make such a mistake on tv (fellation instead od inflation)and as long as it doesn't contain specified threats a very simple reminder of the legal consequences does the job. A former Gov Secretary can take the heat... from an ordinary folk sending a mail... and more than one? I will recommend him to sue the lady as I feel he was somewhat encouraged to send more since he got no answer to his first and the second didn't bounce...?