I'm out. That's how it works, the Euskadi's nation rights don't rely on how may be judged any of its rights movements and anybody's rights, member of one these organisations do not depend on how the organisation may be considered otherwise at least as long as their land is partially occupied, no peace treaty signed and the population forced into a citizenship they haven't necessarily agreed on or accepted on an individual basis. That do work for any of the small nations territories occupied and as long as it is.

The same apply to the Zem case, when it can contribute to illustrate the abuse at the heart of the system, a contribution must be made to show that the type of abuse essentially directed at the small nations interests and rights can spread and hit anyone. It is the best way to establish beyond any doubts that the ideology inspiring one the regime and two a handful of organisations is dangerous and threatening. The right for Zem to speak is the right for the small nations people to speak out and take the fight for their rights one step further. Frankly, it doesn't matter too much if you share or not any of Zem's opinion on anything, the important factor is the right to speak out. The racist accusation is often used recklessly to kill the small nations demand for rights, the opportunity to expose the true face of the people behind these organisations very close to the regime, their lies and intimidation methods asking for Zem to be fired when it can be proved with the tape, he never said what they pretend he said must be used.