No, it is ok, he said it can be debated without reserve. I will post a bit later the full text if u need it but this is the heart of the dissent with the French view"Considering that a pluralist and genuinely democratic society should not only respect the ethnic, cultural, linguistic and religious identity of each person belonging to a national minority, but also create appropriate conditions enabling them to express, preserve and develop this identity; "  ; "The protection of national minorities and of the rights and freedoms of persons belonging to those minorities forms an integral part of the international protection of human rights, and as such falls within the scope of international co-operation. (FCNM)"
Over time I have been convinced that the state of denial of theses diverse identities have contributed (major to me, but some say an important factor... doesn't really matter at this stage) to extreme views of a state national identity. I refer to the FCNM since we must stick to an overall agreement whether or not it explicitly refers to a set of arguments among which the right to elaborate a self determination project has become impossible.