jeudi 20 décembre 2012
Well there are three classes of politicians.... The endeavor of one class is so to caricature the scene as to cast an odium on all Republican Gov? That another class is to infer from the vices and usurpations charged on the French Gov, the proprietary of a blind and unqualified reliance on the infallibility of our own: and on the third, to trace and ascertain the true causes of the abuses in France, as so many rocks to be shunned by an administration that wishes to maintain the character of Republic Gov in general, and the principles of its own in particular. The public will decide which of these classes are best entitled to the name of friends to their country.
Which class do u intend to integrate?
Which class do u intend to integrate?
mercredi 19 décembre 2012
Still think the ECRML declaration is a good legal entry point since there was no hearing whatsoever or public consultation that has been heard of and that makes it suspect. Who did write the declaration, who has approved its content and under which legal text was the content defined as well as the legal process used to do so?
Don't know... "But in order to comprehend this subject fully, and to draw from it all the instructions which it offers, the question must be asked, under what circumstances, and by what means, this Executive omnipotence has been brought about?"
Aren't they after all just doing what the shut people's eyes allows.
Aren't they after all just doing what the shut people's eyes allows.
It does more matter right now anyway to know which branch under which authority has the ECRML been signed with a declaration severely diminishing the expectations of the beneficiaries. As far as I know, none of them (the minorities) have ever been privately consulted and no public hearing ever took place at the French parliament which did not create any committee in charge of the Minorities interests the Charter's will were to protect.
mardi 18 décembre 2012
So yes it is partially true but translated u r soon to be charged with unleashed populism which is extremely common to rebuff any attempt by the constituencies to exert any control. In French, the Representative principle has been changed in nature to be today a representation of ideologies or preempted sides rather than the People and its constituencies allowing by its baseless nature, the Representation to be much more available and exposed to organised and structured special interests and passions of the moment than it could ever be under the most unleashed populism.
That said I m still waiting for urs. I may add something as I feel I m still missing a thing.
No it is alright it is just to be as precise as possible but can't think it through right now it is about the trick they do when cornered over an issue and invoke then the Representative principle to elude any accountability ... It will come out somehow, I guess, may be tomorrow.
How is it going?
That said I m still waiting for urs. I may add something as I feel I m still missing a thing.
No it is alright it is just to be as precise as possible but can't think it through right now it is about the trick they do when cornered over an issue and invoke then the Representative principle to elude any accountability ... It will come out somehow, I guess, may be tomorrow.
How is it going?
May be not. What do u mean exactly? As a matter of fact it is a useful recall "The French Republic, like ours, is founded on the principle of representation and responsibility. The members of its legislature are chosen by the people. They become at short periods amenable to their constituents, by the frequent return of elections. And as further security, they are divided into two branches, as checks the one on the other. If it be true, as alleged, that under these circumstances, a tyrannical usurpation has already taken place in that government, is not here an example in point against the doctrine so ardently propagated by many, that in a republic the People ought to consider the whole of their political duty as discharged when they have chosen their representatives; that it is impossible in fact and ought never to be presumed, that men chosen by the people, and having a common interest with the People, can pursue an interest different from that of the People; and consequently that the People ought at all times to place an unlimited confidence in rulers so chosen, applauding the wisdom of public measures where they can see it and assuring themselves that it is equally the foundation of all others, where nothing but folly and mischief may appear on the face of them.
Nothing can be more contradictory than this reasoning, to the alleged usurpations of the French Government, and yet, however curious it may be, many who proclaim these usurpations with most energy, are the same who with no less energy preach an unlimited confidence in representative government as incapable of them.
The inconsistency is not done away by pleading the extraordinary means employed by the French Government in their illegitimate pursuits, such as the expulsion and banishment of part of their own body, controuling the elections of successors, &c. &c. The observation always recurs, that such means were in fact employed, in such pursuits, by elective and responsible agents; and consequently that such agents are not incapable of violating the trust committed to them.
It must not be permitted however, either to the friend of liberty in despair, or to its enemy in disguise, to turn this inference against the merit and competency of the Representative principle. The true lesson it teaches is, that in no case ought the eyes of the People to be shut on the conduct of those entrusted with power; not their tongues tied from a just wholesome censure on it, any more than from merited commendations. If neither gratitude for the honor of the trust, nor responsibility for the use of it , be sufficient to curb the unruly passions of public functionaries, add new bits to the bridle rather than to take it off altogether. This is the precept of common sense illustrated and enforced by experience - uncontrolled power ever has been, and ever will be administered by the passions more than by reason.
..../....
Nothing can be more contradictory than this reasoning, to the alleged usurpations of the French Government, and yet, however curious it may be, many who proclaim these usurpations with most energy, are the same who with no less energy preach an unlimited confidence in representative government as incapable of them.
The inconsistency is not done away by pleading the extraordinary means employed by the French Government in their illegitimate pursuits, such as the expulsion and banishment of part of their own body, controuling the elections of successors, &c. &c. The observation always recurs, that such means were in fact employed, in such pursuits, by elective and responsible agents; and consequently that such agents are not incapable of violating the trust committed to them.
It must not be permitted however, either to the friend of liberty in despair, or to its enemy in disguise, to turn this inference against the merit and competency of the Representative principle. The true lesson it teaches is, that in no case ought the eyes of the People to be shut on the conduct of those entrusted with power; not their tongues tied from a just wholesome censure on it, any more than from merited commendations. If neither gratitude for the honor of the trust, nor responsibility for the use of it , be sufficient to curb the unruly passions of public functionaries, add new bits to the bridle rather than to take it off altogether. This is the precept of common sense illustrated and enforced by experience - uncontrolled power ever has been, and ever will be administered by the passions more than by reason.
..../....
lundi 17 décembre 2012
Why is it that the usual europhils favoring an unleashed border openness ever promoting the freewill to establish wherever regardless of citizenship of origin and Schengen bigots usually so generous to taunt the ugly selfishness of the little people protesting at the consequences on their communities can turn into violent nationalists so prompt to point fingers at and insult anyone willing to discover the irresistible attraction of the great freedom to establish where feeling the most comfortable within the new borders Schengen has drawn?
Nothing else except eventually to document these nation's descent the French gov refuses to provide support for and forces them to live under the poverty line as a punishment for their ethnic belonging or culture claims. He added it will be the last kick. But the priority remains the timeline documentation.
On one hand we have the natural course of the consequences of eventually difficult economic choices or policies among which undesirable effects on local remote economies such as Corsica, Euskadi or others, were unwanted and as these policies were implemented it appears clearly that to counter the negative effects undermining the coherence and sustainability of the Cultures and People relying on these economies, the Gov has launched programs and actions aimed at reducing the negatives as much as it was possible. On the other hand we have a coherence of both sets of policies economic and cultural whose goals were to undermine both these local remote economies and the cultures they sustained with the inevitable consequences on the People and their descent.
This is what should be the focus and if the mechanisms at work are now understood it leaves to document the timeline.
So it was the conclusion.
This is what should be the focus and if the mechanisms at work are now understood it leaves to document the timeline.
So it was the conclusion.
"In the mean time, however, it may be useful to reflect on the nature of some of the allegations and reproaches under which a country has fallen, that of late was so interesting to us by ties of friendship, and that is still so by relation of her revolution to ours, and by her form of government; as well as by the nature of her markets, by her power, and by her political views, whether amicable or otherwise towards this country. These allegations, if well founded, afford lessons too instructive to be unheeded; and even if unfounded, present an occasion for reflections well adapted to the present posture of our affairs. Our attention will be limited to two articles much dwelt on in the charge against the French Republic.
The first is, that the government has entirely separated itself from the People, and erected itself into a Tyranny, actuated by its own ambitious views, in opposition to the sentiments and interest of the nation.
..../....
The second charge against the French Republic is, that the Directory has gained an omnipotent ascendancy over the Legislature, and makes use of its authority to sanction and disguise all the projects of its own ambition and rapacity.
..../...."
Thought u may love that. Generally speaking the time goes by but there are things that don't change, do they?
What was said, testify before Congress before going down the Courtroom aisle is highly preferred since it should be the opportunity to give full and satisfactory information based on the course of facts and events properly authenticated.
The first is, that the government has entirely separated itself from the People, and erected itself into a Tyranny, actuated by its own ambitious views, in opposition to the sentiments and interest of the nation.
..../....
The second charge against the French Republic is, that the Directory has gained an omnipotent ascendancy over the Legislature, and makes use of its authority to sanction and disguise all the projects of its own ambition and rapacity.
..../...."
Thought u may love that. Generally speaking the time goes by but there are things that don't change, do they?
What was said, testify before Congress before going down the Courtroom aisle is highly preferred since it should be the opportunity to give full and satisfactory information based on the course of facts and events properly authenticated.
jeudi 13 décembre 2012
I don't know anything u like to say about it? To me, on top of what I already said ... it looks to me like a replay slightly modernized of Peppone (he's the mayor of a village and has an anti clerical bias - today would be a member of moveon.org I guess) and Don Camillo (he's the Roman Catholic priest of the village) fighting to win hearts and minds, Peppone calling his legally binding contract a "marriage" to piss off Don Camillo.... and Don Camillo enraged at the idea Peppone dare celebrating faked "marriages".... :-))))
Come on... The Faroe Islands aren't net oil or LNG exporter and they do not have a lot of natural resources does it prevent a modern society, healthy and going fine? Do they need some centralized costly bureaucracy to thrive... no. It is a small community and frankly when I last visited I didn't feel any angst of not having the euro or any hurry to join the euro crisis mess and people I talk to were rather surprised with the recklessness and lazy easy going in Brussels when it comes to banking, business and handling of public finances within the eurozone. When told northern europe is rich, they asked if I meant Scandinavia, I said yes and they said well sir, we love what we do, we do it right and we build, we are very proud of our accomplishments, thank you for overstating it and smiled.
I replied, Feel the same have it great!
I love these people anyway I have some hope you may be able to profit of all the legislation they have adopted as a source of inspiration for the autonomy coming at least.
I replied, Feel the same have it great!
I love these people anyway I have some hope you may be able to profit of all the legislation they have adopted as a source of inspiration for the autonomy coming at least.
Actually, there is no problem with that kind of policies even if it doesn't look right as long as the map of the local economies targeted don't recover a more ethnic map. How to get from here to there is to look at the French Ministry of Culture policies over the same period to find out if any support had been enacted to compensate the undesirable consequences of the centralized economic policies or if the "culture" policies were also pursuing the same goals during that same period.
If both set of policies were enacted to pursue the decline of the Cultures and Economies the FCNM wish to protect, think there is something there that can be profitable there in the prosecution. Am I understandable ?
If both set of policies were enacted to pursue the decline of the Cultures and Economies the FCNM wish to protect, think there is something there that can be profitable there in the prosecution. Am I understandable ?
Well it is because it is not documented until now anyway. The fact that the French state has been involved in collecting taxes and refusing access to the banking system for these local economies to grow while funding "centralized" companies sitting in Paris and around partly with the taxes collected in the territories that belongs to the Minorities with one goal which was to ensure local ethnic economies would disappear for the profit of larger entities sitting in the capital and into different hands was aimed at deprived the Minorities the FCNM wish to protect of the economic means to sustain their culture and language.
So, think I'd like u to have a look at it and rewrite it to improve the understanding of these mechanisms and policies that took place over the last three to four decades. (Clearly, the successive reforms of the banking system under various justifications had one common point drive local banks or community banks into situations they had to merge or close, the first step to cut these economies to be able to fund their growth.
And no Germany local banks won't be under ECB supervision. Go to the FT they had it all this morning.
mercredi 12 décembre 2012
It doesn't matter. Those that do feel French, vote and elect officials that can't say they represent the members openly supporting a more affirmed national identity since they have repeatedly failed to support the FCNM. Their opposition to the FCNM as well as the ECRML makes them unable to represent the part of the nation supporting these texts since whether or not they are a minority doesn't matter, their point of view and arguments have the right to a representation under the Strategic Framework on Human Rights and Democracy.
Well, they are funny with that because the back minded idea of let's all be french is to be off the hook for the nation's descent they took the land by force (meaning they can't show a peace treaty or a vote of the People) and get away with the support they owe them regardless of how they feel French or not, they don't have to feel so.
no they can't.... not for you or anyone that can prove his ancestry belong to a nation the French took the Land by force and it doesn't matter how long ago these events took place or if the ancestry allegedly took part or didn't take part in the French revolution regardless of the account of the motives u leave France for.
mardi 11 décembre 2012
"But that we may not be mis-led in this case, by that which is the danger every-where, I mean by the doubtfulness of Terms, 'tis fit to observe, that certainty is twofold; Certainty of Truth, and Certainty of Knowledge. Certainty of Truth is, when words are so put together in Propositions, as exactly to express the agreement or disagreement of the Ideas they stand for, as really it is. Certainty of Knowledge is, to perceive the agreement or disagreement of Ideas, as expressed in any Proposition. This we usually call knowing, or being certain of the Truth of any Proposition."
that's it.
that's it.
dimanche 9 décembre 2012
M shocked but well what else.... The French state has been involved in the passed ordering or carrying crimes such as set ablaze restaurants on Corsican beaches after a bad row they had with the local authorities over who was licensed to operate these premises. The French wanted some companies from Paris to be licensed and the locals didn't accept it. It is very difficult to be sure of who is engaged in organised crime since a good example of what's going on is best illustrated through something very common on the island, a Corsican local company wants to expand or create a new activity, they can't find funding, for the same activity, a non corsican company the gov favors will find funding to take the business through the centralized banking system. The ultimate goal being to take over the local economy and make sure economic leaders in Corsica are non Corsicans. The same thing is happening with the Land. So does that kind of banking serving exclusively non corsican interests sparkle violence....? Guess.
I didn't know... never thought the guy was such a hater.... but she is looking for the video, a guy from "terra nova" an extreme french organisation a year ago as I recall it mentioned in a debate that "they" had two left areas to normalise, Euskadi and Corsica. (french was oui nous avons encore 2 poches à reduire.... qui ont encore une identité forte).
My knowledge is limited but if you want a better idea of what is going on there this is a good starting point, it is signed by CORTE 96 Anna CECCALDI, Madeleine KOVALEVSKY, Marie-Antoinette NUTTINCK, Lucien FERRACCI, Jacques ORSONI, Gaston PIETRI, François PERNIN, Sampiero SANGUINETTI.
Article here (published november 2011)
Article here (published november 2011)
vendredi 7 décembre 2012
In a normal world, a French official travelling to Corsica or anywhere else would thanked for being welcomed with at least a few words in Corsican and I think if he or she doesn't speak it fluently, people would understand that but just education and politeness should lead to that. That's all I meant really, it just sounds so strange sometimes.
Think it is a mix. That's what I told you last night, they are wounded and classic bad instinct they want everybody else to be as well that's why they can't stand the idea or to see whether it is the Corsicans or Euskadi, or... Breizh enjoy the rights that come with the native status (the EU called it National Minorities - FCNM) celebrate their culture and speak their language.... so from that point of view Valls is no better than Sarky was but, these guys made a choice and didn't grieve properly their loss and to me it explains why they can't stand the native nations celebrating themselves. That's explains their reaction but the French state paved the way, I mean you can go through the entire political spectrum or look back in time, the original Jacobin crime is for everybody to see and watch how it propagates hatred through time and people regardless of their origins making an entire society turned to intolerance and refusal to see native nations just be themselves.
jeudi 6 décembre 2012
Come on.... The guy just like many immigrant or people of immigrant descent hate the native nations. They have a problem dealing with the legitimacy of the native's rights and power of traditions and that explain why they are so proactively engaged in fighting against the ECRML or the FCNM. So is the attempt of foiling the Natives under a racial banner a weapon of choice, yes it is. Of course it is. But it isn't going to get any better, I found out that their motives are deeply rooted in their own personal story most of the time.... keep in mind they too are Natives somewhere and they have to forgive themselves for the betrayal of their own Land, Culture, Language and Nation, deal with the guilt, sometime regrets, hopes, excuses, motives and as u did and I did you had to deal with that. We are not equal and the outcome of that debate will determine how you handle the relations with the Native Nations in general. Tell me it never crossed your mind as an excuse that heading to a new culture and land, once done, u would help members of your nation to escape as well?
mercredi 5 décembre 2012
No CBO... and to be honest it is difficult to start a CBO from scratch and a CBO without the Press and people paying attention and ready to pressure big spenders where it hurts with a campaign at their home front door isn't easy where "dont spit in the soup" (understand... haven't u ever benefited from the state generosity in some way so u should shut up) is a second nature. Can't think of anything close do u ?
Not false at all. France isn't the only country like that in the EU but it is true that an overwhelming majority doesn't pay any attention at how is spent the taxes money and as a result, politicians have run big deficits for years accumulating giant amounts of debt.... and guess what, who will be hit the hardest the day the party runs out of punch and the gov wakes up with a hangover? Everybody will get a hit but clearly those who had the most to loose at the unleashed spending are precisely the very same regularly invoked to justify the spending... Look at who is paying in Greece. It is outrageous.
mardi 4 décembre 2012
lundi 3 décembre 2012
dimanche 2 décembre 2012
A sunday in Euskal Herria getting ready for the festive season and a new year closer to reunification and independence
Gizonen lana jakintza dugu: ezagutuz aldatzea,
naturarekin bat izan eta harremanentan sartzea.
Eta indarrak ongi errotuz, gure sustraiak lurrari lotuz,
bertatikan irautea: ezaren gudaz baietza sortuz,
ukazioa legetzat hartuz beti aurrera joatea.
Gu sortu ginen enbor beretik sortuko dira besteak,
burruka hortan iraungo duten zuhaitz-ardaska gazteak.
Beren aukeren jabe eraikiz ta erortzean berriro jaikiz
ibiltzen joanen direnak
Oskorriren Furra Furra
Inscription à :
Articles (Atom)